HR & Recruitment
Hire faster, spend less, keep your people.
The problem
- Cost-per-hire ~$4,700 and ~44 days to fill
- Resume overload buries recruiters
- Turnover quietly drains budgets
What AI actually does about it
- AI resume screening & ranking
- Candidate sourcing and outreach at scale
- JD, offer-letter and interview automation
Outcome
43% of organizations now use AI in HR, up from 26% in 2024 (SHRM 2025).
Constraints that apply
US: NYC Local Law 144 bias audits, EEOC guidance. UK: UK-GDPR + equality bias checks. Gulf: Emiratisation/Saudization + PDPL candidate consent.
About the figures on this page
These are indicative industry figures, not BvLogic measurements, and we have not verified them. They came from vendor and industry coverage when this page was written. We have not re-sourced them, we do not know the sample they came from, and we would not put them in front of you as evidence.
We are saying so because elsewhere on this site we refuse to print a peer median on the grounds that a number from no respondents is a fabricated number in the position of maximum influence. That standard has to apply here too, or it is not a standard. Use these to frame a question, not to support a business case — and if you need a figure you can defend, the Enterprise Outcome Record sets out what it takes to produce one.
Cost-per-hire savings
What AI screening could save.
Loading…
Runs in your browser. Estimates only, not professional advice.
Work with us
If you want this implemented rather than explained, see Enterprise Services or tell us what you need.