Red Team My Enterprise
Describe your technology strategy and this attacks it: architecture, vendors, security, cloud, AI, cost, continuity, technical debt, contracts and staffing. Ranked by how certain the evidence is, with a verification step you can run yourself.
Answer what you can and leave the rest. This attacks the strategy you describe and ranks what breaks first. Nothing you enter leaves your browser.
The rule this tool is built under
No probability here is invented. A finding states a number only when it cites a figure we have published or a dated obligation with whoever set the date. Where we have no base rate, the finding says so in those words and is raised on the structure of the risk instead.
That makes some findings less satisfying than "82% likelihood of failure". It is also the difference between a report a CIO can take to a board and one that falls apart the first time somebody asks where the number came from. A risk we cannot quantify is still worth raising; pretending we quantified it is not.
Why every finding ends with a verification step
You should not have to trust us. Each finding closes with something you can check on your own estate — a list to ask for, a date to name, a number to count. If the check is easy and the answer is uncomfortable, that is the finding doing its job. If nobody can answer at all, the absence of an answer is usually the more serious result.
What it cannot see
It works from what you tell it, so it cannot find the thing you did not think to mention. It has no access to your systems and asks for no data about them, which is what makes it usable in the first conversation rather than after a procurement cycle. Treat an empty result as unexamined rather than safe.
It also cannot weigh findings against each other for your business. A licensing exposure and an untested restore are ranked here by how certain the evidence is, not by what they would cost you specifically — that judgement needs your context and belongs to you.
What to do with the output
Take the dated obligations first. They are not risks to weigh, they are facts you have not acted on yet, and they have the useful property of being unarguable. Then take the finding with the cheapest verification step and run it this week. A red team report that produces one verified fact is worth more than one that produces sixteen accepted opinions.
Educational and informational. Not legal, financial or investment advice, and not a substitute for a licensing position agreed in writing with your vendor.
It runs entirely in your browser and nothing you type is transmitted or stored. The output is indicative and derived from your own inputs, so it is only as good as they are. It is educational material, not professional, financial, legal or tax advice, and it is not an audit, a quote or a substitute for review by someone who can see your actual environment.